Vit D Optimisation Requires Supplementation Says Harvard
The conservative Harvard Medical School in the USA normally promotes micronutrient intake being derived from food stuffs alone. The Health Publications Bulletin out in Sept 2009 says that from the perspective of Vitamin D food sources may be inadequate and that supplementary intake is required to meet physiological optimisation. (See Video)
Whilst there are questions being raised about the need for additional oral nutrient supplementation, and even some indications there may be risk from excess ingestion of certain nutrients, on the whole, the concept that the typical dietary intake of the majority of the population meets their daily needs is attractive but flawed. Many events, and genes conspire to work against optimal ingestion of nutrient rich foods, illness and exercise then add additional requirements. The use of supplements remains a low risk to high reward way of attaining individualised optimal nutrient intake along with sensible food choices.
Related articles:
- Do Flu Vaccines Provide Real Protection?
- High Levels of Mercury in Fish – Found in USA Streams
- Impact Of Antioxidant Supplementation On Chemotherapeutic Toxicity: A Systematic Review Of The Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials.
- Has Mandatory Folic Acid Supplementation Of Foods Increased The Risk Of Asthma And Allergic Disease?
- BioMask BF-200. Mimics Mucosal Cells Then Minerals Kill the H1N1 Virus
Keywords:A(H1N1), antioxidants, diet, evidence, immune, immunity, mucosal, nutrition, osteoporosis, prevention, treatment, vitamins
If you found this post interesting, please share it, leave a comment or subscribe to the RSS feed and get future posts delivered to your feed reader.
Leave Comment
You can ask technical questions, be as supportive, critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Your comments will be published only after verification.

The immune system is prone to the same grave misfortunes as any defense system handling weapons: collateral damage that comes with the destruction of the enemy on one’s own territory and friendly fire due to mistaken identity. Whereas the collateral damage is the price we pay for clearance of infections, autoimmunity is a pathological process. Nevertheless, the effector mechanisms involved in both processes are the same. Whether environment can be a cause, a trigger or an amplifier of an autoimmune disease are questions that are being intensively investigated.


